🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.